Michelle Obama: ‘I Was Always Really Good on the Campaign Trail’
Former First Lady Michelle Obama is once again drawing conservative fire for self-praise and grievance politics after boasting about her skills as a speaker during a recent appearance at the 2026 ESSENCE Festival.
Speaking on her “IMO: The Look” podcast conversation with Keke Palmer at the event, Obama defended her oratory abilities while lamenting how media coverage during her husband’s campaigns focused on her wardrobe rather than her message.
“I was always really good on the campaign trail. I was always a powerful orator because my topic was good. It was about my husband,” Obama said.
“Now, I’m giving him passionate speeches. I think people know now that I can give a speech. That wasn’t just that. Didn’t just start happening; I was always really good on the campaign trail. I was always a powerful orator,” Obama added.
She complained that early articles about her often led with descriptions of her clothing, such as “She was wearing a purple sheath, and she had on this pair of shoes,” instead of her content.
Obama framed this as a broader tactic against women in public life.
“This is how we treat women in public life. We diminish them to just what they look like and not what I’m saying,” she added.
Obama also recalled realizing the political nature of attacks on her style, noting it was a way to “slow me down” because she was useful in undermining her husband.
Conservatives quickly pushed back on social media, calling the remarks tone-deaf and insufferable.
Critics noted that Obama enjoyed overwhelmingly positive media treatment, massive book deals, and lucrative speaking fees throughout her time in the spotlight — hardly the portrait of someone “diminished.”
Many pointed out the irony of a wealthy, highly privileged former First Lady who has long lectured Americans on everything from food to patriotism now complaining about superficial coverage years later.
Social media backlash has been swift, with users accusing Obama of remaining stuck in “victim mode” despite her elevated status.
WATCH:
This comes as the Obama Presidential Center has already come under fire after opening earlier this month.
But away from the spotlight, a very different story is still developing.
Multiple subcontractors who helped build the Obama Presidential Center say they are still fighting to recover millions of dollars they claim remain unpaid after years of work on the project.
Mike Owen, owner of Adamson Plumbing, told Fox News Digital that his company is nearly $4 million in the red after working on the project.
“That is a hole that no subcontractor, small business can survive,” Owen said.
Omar Shareef, president of the African American Contractors Association, told Fox News Digital that several Black-owned contractors privately approached him seeking help after suffering significant losses tied to the project.
“The promise was that this project was going to uplift minority contractors and uplift the community,” Shareef said. “What sense is celebrating Juneteenth if our Black contractors are not getting their money?”
Shareef further warned that some firms could lose their bonding capacity, supplier relationships, and access to future projects if the disputes remain unresolved.
The numbers involved are substantial.
Fox News Digital reports that one minority-owned subcontractor claimed losses of approximately $2.5 million, while the largest publicly known dispute involves claims exceeding $40 million connected to major concrete work on the project.
Court filings also show that at least two subcontractors later sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, although the filings do not establish that the Obama Center project directly caused those financial difficulties.
The Obama Foundation has pushed back on the criticism. Foundation officials note that the project’s construction manager, Lakeside Alliance, was responsible for hiring and managing subcontractors.
The Foundation also states that it has no contractual relationship with subcontractors and no outstanding disputed charges with Lakeside Alliance.
Shocking 'truth' behind Prince Harry's decision to quit major role
Prince Harry should have "resigned in disgrace" from the board of a controversial African wildlife charity, a commentator says. James Walker makes the bombshell remark in Wednesday's episode of this publication's podcast, Daily Expresso.
He and the show's host, JJ Anisiobi, delve into the Duke of Sussex's dramatic decision to step down from African Parks. James, commenting on the controversy, said: "When you hear about this stuff and how long it's been going on for, you should be resigning in disgrace. [Harry] should be saying: 'I'm not touching that with a barge pole. That is a failed entity. We're going nowhere near it'.
"But no. He's still saying he's going to 'support their mission'. And again this Caroline Pearce, executive director of Survival International, goes on to say: 'His departure doesn't undo that record'.
"She alleged that African Parks was aware of the abuses for years, but it was only after Survival complained to Harry that the charity finally commissioned an investigation."
James added: "Well, she's got a point."
It emerged on Monday (August 24) that Harry was no longer a board member of the wildlife charity.
The conservation organisation has admitted that human rights abuses were committed by its rangers against members of the semi-nomadic Baka group in Congo-Brazzaville.
African Parks has said since that it has improved its safeguarding processes both in the Odzala-Kokoua National Park and institutionally.
Its admission followed an independent human rights investigation into allegations guards managed and paid by the charity had beaten, raped and tortured indigenous people in Odzala-Kokoua National Park.
Harry was president of the charity for six years before he became a member of its board of directors in 2023.
A spokesman for the Duke said he remains an active and avid supporter of African Parks. He added: "The Duke is proud of his 10 years with African Parks and fully supports the ongoing strengthening of its board.
"His commitment to conservation in Africa continues and he remains a supporter of African Parks’ mission."
Human rights organisation, Survival International, said it had been calling on Harry to step down from African Parks for years.
The group's director, Caroline Pearce, said in a statement: "It’s outrageous that for 10 years Prince Harry has served African Parks while the organisation has been responsible for abuse and violence against Indigenous people.
"His departure doesn't undo that record — African Parks itself must now be held accountable, and must abandon this model of fortress conservation for good."
Survival International said indigenous peoples know how best to manage their land and the idea outsiders know better is racist and colonial.
