The Supreme Court Just Let the Carroll Verdict Stand — and the Silence From Conservative Justices Is Deafening

The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump’s appeal in the E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse case on Monday, letting stand the $5 million jury verdict from May 2023 that found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The unsigned order provided no explanation, no noted dissents, and no indication of how individual justices voted — including whether Thomas, Alito, or any of the Trump appointees attempted to take the case.
The silence is the most significant part. When a case this consequential gets denied without a single noted dissent from a court with three Trump appointees, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, something has gone wrong somewhere. Whether that’s a failure of nerve, a legal assessment that the petition was procedurally flawed, or something else entirely — the public isn’t being told. The unsigned order simply says no, and that’s it.

On the merits, the Carroll case has always been deeply problematic. No corroborating witnesses. No physical evidence. No specific date for an alleged assault that Carroll says happened sometime in the mid-1990s at a department store. A dress that Carroll claimed to have worn during the alleged attack that wasn’t in production at the time the media originally claimed the incident occurred. An Adult Survivors Act — signed by New York Democrats specifically to enable time-barred claims against Trump — that allowed a lawsuit that would have been legally dead under normal statute of limitations rules.
The $83.3 million verdict from Carroll I — for Trump’s denial of the allegations, which courts have treated as defamation — sits on top of the $5 million from Carroll II. Combined, that’s over $88 million in civil liability for a man who has consistently denied the allegations, for an incident that allegedly occurred decades ago, based on one witness’s account with no corroborating evidence.
The double standard is undeniable and should be stated plainly. The same institutions that treated E. Jean Carroll as an unimpeachable truth-teller have consistently given Bill Clinton, Hunter Biden, and other Democratic figures the benefit of every doubt in similar or worse allegations. That isn’t justice. It is a two-tiered legal system that produces different outcomes based on the defendant’s political affiliation — and the Supreme Court’s decision to leave the Carroll verdicts intact without explanation does nothing to address that fundamental inequity.

There’s also a broader principle at stake. Any accusation, no matter how lacking in corroborating evidence, can now result in massive civil liability for Republican politicians under New York’s expanded statute of limitations framework — while Democratic figures face no equivalent legal exposure regardless of the credibility of allegations against them.
The Carroll verdict will stand. The $88 million liability will stand. And the question of whether the Supreme Court’s conservative justices believe the case deserved scrutiny will remain unanswered behind an unsigned order with no dissents noted. That silence is not reassuring.
BREAKING: Dolly Parton’s Cause Of Death Revealed: ‘Brief Battle’

Dolly Parton’s death came after a brief battle with cancer, her representatives revealed Tuesday.
The country music legend died Aug. 25 at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville. She was 80.
Parton had been admitted to the cancer center Friday, four days before her death. Her representatives confirmed the cancer diagnosis in a statement to PEOPLE but did not disclose what type she had.
“Our beloved Dolly Parton spent her life and career bringing joy, laughter, hope and integrity into everything she touched. Her unmatched generosity reached the lives of countless people whom she would never meet, yet she was always there to offer a helping hand,” the statement read.
“Whether it be the hundreds of millions of books donated through her invaluable Imagination Library or funding research that helped create a lifesaving vaccine used around the world, Dolly’s unconditional love for all people was the guiding force for her lasting impact. After bravely facing a brief battle with cancer, Dolly departed her Earthly life today at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center surrounded by loved ones,” the statement concluded.

The “Jolene” singer had also been dealing with kidney and autoimmune issues before her death, PEOPLE previously reported.
Just days earlier, Dolly Parton opened up about her declining health and acknowledged that she had put off addressing some medical issues while caring for her husband, Carl.
“As I’ve shared in video messages throughout the past year, I am dealing with some health issues that I just didn’t pay attention to when I was watching over [my husband] Carl. You know, this isn’t the first time I’ve had to manage something like this. Back in the early ’80s, I was down for several months with female issues, and I was struggling with my weight at the time too, so it’s not like I haven’t been through hard times with my health,” Parton told PEOPLE.
Her nephew, Bryan Seaver, announced her death in an Instagram video Tuesday on behalf of the Parton and Owens family.
“My name is Bryan Seaver, son of Cassie Parton, and I’m representing the Parton and Owens family today announcing the passing of my aunt, Dolly Rebecca Parton Dean, Sister, Sis and Granny to one generation and Gigi to the next,” he says in the video.
Seaver, who served as Parton’s head of security for more than two decades, said she had asked him years earlier to deliver the announcement.
“This video announcement is something Dolly asked of me years ago, before I fully absorbed it as a future reality,” he continued. “As her head of security for more than two decades, a role my father Larry held before me, I have imagined the heaviness of this moment but haven’t truly felt it until now.”

Seaver said the moment brought immense pride and heartbreak, but he took comfort in his faith that Parton had been reunited with Carl and other loved ones.
Seaver added: “It is an honor, an honor that is mixed with absolute pride and great sadness. But sadness lies with us, not with Dolly. Dolly has lived in the light and is in the arms of Jesus, surely met by Carl, her parents and countless othe
Shocking 'truth' behind Prince Harry's decision to quit major role

Prince Harry should have "resigned in disgrace" from the board of a controversial African wildlife charity, a commentator says. James Walker makes the bombshell remark in Wednesday's episode of this publication's podcast, Daily Expresso.
He and the show's host, JJ Anisiobi, delve into the Duke of Sussex's dramatic decision to step down from African Parks. James, commenting on the controversy, said: "When you hear about this stuff and how long it's been going on for, you should be resigning in disgrace. [Harry] should be saying: 'I'm not touching that with a barge pole. That is a failed entity. We're going nowhere near it'.
"But no. He's still saying he's going to 'support their mission'. And again this Caroline Pearce, executive director of Survival International, goes on to say: 'His departure doesn't undo that record'.
"She alleged that African Parks was aware of the abuses for years, but it was only after Survival complained to Harry that the charity finally commissioned an investigation."
James added: "Well, she's got a point."

It emerged on Monday (August 24) that Harry was no longer a board member of the wildlife charity.
The conservation organisation has admitted that human rights abuses were committed by its rangers against members of the semi-nomadic Baka group in Congo-Brazzaville.
African Parks has said since that it has improved its safeguarding processes both in the Odzala-Kokoua National Park and institutionally.
Its admission followed an independent human rights investigation into allegations guards managed and paid by the charity had beaten, raped and tortured indigenous people in Odzala-Kokoua National Park.

Harry was president of the charity for six years before he became a member of its board of directors in 2023.
A spokesman for the Duke said he remains an active and avid supporter of African Parks. He added: "The Duke is proud of his 10 years with African Parks and fully supports the ongoing strengthening of its board.
"His commitment to conservation in Africa continues and he remains a supporter of African Parks’ mission."
Human rights organisation, Survival International, said it had been calling on Harry to step down from African Parks for years.
The group's director, Caroline Pearce, said in a statement: "It’s outrageous that for 10 years Prince Harry has served African Parks while the organisation has been responsible for abuse and violence against Indigenous people.
"His departure doesn't undo that record — African Parks itself must now be held accountable, and must abandon this model of fortress conservation for good."
Survival International said indigenous peoples know how best to manage their land and the idea outsiders know better is racist and colonial.
Iran TV Airs Sick Threat Against Barron Trump, Reports of $10M Bounty

Iranian state media aired an insane video about killing Barron Trump, along with reporting a $10 million bounty on his head ... and it's sure to get President Donald Trump's attention.
Play video content

CAUSE FOR CONCERN
Video: Iran TV Broadcasts Disturbing Threat Against Barron Trump, Reports $10M Bounty
The "Where to kill Barron Trump" clip says Barron's movements are being "fully monitored" while he's attending New York University ... and claims Barron's accounts for Xbox and Discord have been hacked.
The video goes into depth about what Barron wears ... and what his bodyguards wear. It also alleges his travel habits.

Per reports, the f-ed-up video is tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps ... and it's a big-time escalation in the threats coming out of Iran toward Trump as the war rages on.
The chilling video aired amid Trump ratcheting up pressure on Iran to finally crack ... his latest measure, dubbed "economic D-Day,” is meant to cripple Iran's economy.

The video might just be a BS scary tactic ... but it's still pretty freaking unnerving for the 20-year-old college student.